Navy evaluation examples
Choose the format for the Sailor’s report and grade. Keep each person’s drafts in a separate package. These examples were generated in RapidEPR on October 17, 2026 with fictional inputs and Moderate variation. Each example shows one complete returned option, except Chief Eval, which shows all trait groups. Review added claims and replace placeholders such asxx with verified facts before use.
EVAL - Tailored (E1-E6)
Use this format for NAVPERS 1616/26. Select a trait, Career Recommendations, Comments on Performance or Qualifications / Achievements.
Input:
E6 Jones led 14 Sailors through INSURV preparation. Corrected 184 discrepancies, raised maintenance completion from 72% to 96% and qualified nine Sailors.Output (Option 1):
- Led 14 Sailors through INSURV preparation, aligning xx workstreams for inspection readiness.
- Corrected 184 INSURV discrepancies across xx maintenance actions, closing documented gaps.
- Raised completion from 72% to 96% across xx tracked maintenance actions.
- Qualified 9 Sailors across xx watchstations, expanding work-center qualification depth.
- Coordinated xx inspection checks with 14 Sailors, advancing INSURV corrective work.
- Tracked 184 discrepancies through xx follow-up reviews, sustaining closure accountability.
- Applied 72%-to-96% maintenance gains across xx systems during INSURV preparation.
- Trained 9 Sailors through xx qualification events, building depth for INSURV requirements.
- Closed xx maintenance actions across xx systems, reinforcing 96% completion results.
- Managed INSURV preparation with 14 Sailors and 184 corrections, documenting team output.
FITREP - Tailored (W2-O6)
Use this format for NAVPERS 1610/2. Select the section you are writing, such as duties, a trait, career recommendations or comments on performance.
Input:
LT Smith served as communications officer for 12 months, led 18 Sailors and managed a $2.4 million radio suite. Also served as CMS custodian.Output (Option 1):
COMMO COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER-12; CMS CUSTODIAN. Led 18 Sailors; managed $2.4M radio suite and CMS accountability, coordinating xx maintenance actions, xx circuit checks, xx inventory items, and communications support for xx command evolutions.
Chief Eval
Use this format for comments grouped under the seven CHIEFEVAL traits: Technical Mastery, Institutional Expertise, Professionalism, Integrity, Accountability, Deckplate Leadership and Team Effectiveness. An empty trait group displays “No supporting accomplishment supplied.” Add relevant accomplishments to generate text for that trait; do not copy the empty-group message into an evaluation.
Input:
Led the Chief’s Mess through a seven-month deployment. Mentored 12 first-class petty officers and helped eight qualify as new watchstanders.Output (all seven trait groups):
Technical Mastery
Helped 8 Sailors qualify as watchstanders during a 7-month deployment, expanding watchbill capability and supporting operational readiness.
Institutional Expertise
No supporting accomplishment supplied.
Professionalism
Mentored 12 first-class petty officers during a 7-month deployment, strengthening professional growth and future leadership capacity.
Integrity
No supporting accomplishment supplied.
Accountability
No supporting accomplishment supplied.
Deckplate Leadership
Led the Chief’s Mess through a 7-month deployment, sustaining senior-enlisted leadership and supporting Sailors throughout operations.
Team Effectiveness
No supporting accomplishment supplied.
Chief Eval Summary (Block 40)
Use this format for the Reporting Senior Comments on Performance section of NAVPERS 1616/27.
Input:
Led the Chief’s Mess through deployment, mentored five first-class petty officers who advanced and sustained 95% retention.Output (Option 1):
TRUSTED CHIEF’S MESS LEADER THROUGH DEPLOYMENT. Led the Mess through deployment, sustaining unity, standards, and focus amid operational demands. Mentored five First Class Petty Officers; all five advanced, strengthening the command’s next generation of enlisted leaders. Sustained 95% retention while prioritizing Sailor development and mission readiness. Retain and assign to demanding CPO Mess leadership roles.
Eval Bullet
Use this format for a standalone enlisted EVAL statement.
Input:
Built a maintenance tracker for three work centers and cut weekly report preparation from four hours to one.Output (Option 1):
Innovative Technician. Built and implemented a maintenance tracker serving three work centers, streamlining weekly reporting and cutting preparation time from four hours to one. Saved three hours—or 75%—each week, improved visibility of maintenance actions, and enabled more timely oversight of work essential to equipment readiness and mission execution.
Opening Statement
Provide the performance or ranking you want to introduce.
Input:
Top E5 in the work center. Led INSURV preparation and helped six Sailors qualify.Output (Option 1):
TOP E-5 IN THE WORK CENTER, [Rank/Name] DROVE INSURV PREPARATIONS AND QUALIFIED SIX SAILORS—A MISSION-READY LEADER WHO ELEVATES THE ENTIRE TEAM!
Closing Statement
Provide your advancement and assignment recommendations.
Input:
Recommended for advancement to E6 and assignment as an LPO or instructor.Output (Option 1):
[Rank/Name], [Rating] is ready to lead at the next level—advance to E6 and assign as an LPO or instructor to amplify mission readiness and Sailor development.

