Air Force evaluation examples
Use a package for each Airman’s evaluation. Choose OPB Section or EPB Section when writing a specific part of the report. These examples were generated in RapidEPR on October 17, 2026 with fictional inputs and Moderate variation. Each example shows one complete returned option. Review added claims and replace placeholders such asxx with verified facts before use.
OPB Section (Officer)
Choose the section you need on the officer’s OPB, such as Duty Description, Executing the Mission, Leading People or HLR Performance Statement.
Input:
Commanded A-Flight’s 38 Airmen and managed $14 million in flightline support equipment. Raised sortie recovery from 88% to 96% across 42 missions.Output (Option 1):
Commanded 38 A-Flight Airmen and applied $14M in flightline support equipment to raise sortie recovery from 88% to 96% across 42 missions, strengthening mission execution and improving the flight’s ability to recover sorties on schedule.
EPB Section (Enlisted)
Choose the EPB section and the Airman’s rated grade. MSgt-SMSgt Stratification is available for MSgt and SMSgt. CMSgt Higher Responsibility Support is available for CMSgt. Use the rated Airman’s grade to see the eligible sections.SrA_Below means SrA and below.
Input:
As a SSgt and A-Flight lead trainer, trained 10 Airmen through 43 core tasks.Output (Option 1):
As A-Flight lead trainer, coached 10 Airmen through 43 core tasks, reinforcing consistent standards and clear task communication; improved team proficiency by xx%, strengthened shift coordination, and gave supervisors measurable visibility into training progress across xx qualification areas.
EPB/OPB
Use this format for a standalone performance statement.
Input:
Led five maintainers on night shift to return two aircraft to service before their scheduled missions.Output (Option 1):
Led five maintainers through night-shift recovery actions, returning two aircraft to service before their scheduled missions; restored aircraft availability for planned tasking, protected mission timelines, sustained operational readiness, and ensured both aircraft were available when required.
EPB/OPB - Tailored (Legacy)
Choose one of the four Major Performance Areas to guide the statement.
Input:
Created a tracker for 52 overdue training requirements. Helped supervisors clear the backlog in six weeks.Output (Option 1):
Created a centralized tracker for 52 overdue training requirements, giving supervisors clear status and ownership to drive backlog closure within six weeks; the repeatable process improved unit visibility, sharpened follow-up, and established a reliable baseline for monitoring future training suspenses and preventing recurring delays.
ALQ
Name the Airman Leadership Quality you want to address and describe the supporting action.
Input:
Communication. Briefed 18 maintainers on a new aircraft inspection process and answered their questions before the first shift used it.Output (Option 1):
Briefed 18 maintainers on a new aircraft inspection process and clarified xx questions before first-shift use, aligning the team on required steps, reducing uncertainty at implementation, and supporting consistent execution of inspections from the start.
Duty Description
Describe the job, mission and scope of responsibility. Include personnel, equipment or budget figures that belong to the role.
Input:
Assistant director of operations for a flying squadron with 75 aircrew and 25 aircraft. Coordinates daily flying operations and training.Output (Option 1):
Serves as Assistant Director of Operations for a flying squadron supporting 75 aircrew and 25 aircraft. Coordinates daily flying operations and aircrew training, including schedule execution, training requirements, and readiness tracking for xx mission areas. Supports the commander and flight leadership with operational coordination, reporting, and management of xx programs.
HLR Assessment
Provide the performance you want the higher level reviewer to address. Use the OPB or EPB section formats for separate stratification fields and mandatory comments.
Input:
Led inspection preparation, corrected 64 findings and raised program compliance from 78% to 96%.Output (Option 1):
Led inspection preparation, corrected 64 findings, and raised program compliance from 78% to 96%, strengthening inspection readiness and establishing a more reliable standard for sustained program execution.
Traditional
Input:
Led five maintainers on night shift to return two aircraft to service before their scheduled missions.Output (Option 1):
Led 5 mx’rs on night shift; rtn’d 2 acft to svc ahead of sched msn—boosted flt rdy & msn success across wg ops
Narrative (v1)
Input:
Led five maintainers on night shift to return two aircraft to service before their scheduled missions.Output (Option 1):
Led five maintainers on night shift, returning two aircraft to service before scheduled missions by coordinating repairs, which restored xx hours of availability, preserved xx sorties, and strengthened Air Force mission readiness.
Narrative (v2)
Input:
Led five maintainers on night shift to return two aircraft to service before their scheduled missions.Output (Option 1):
Directed five maintainers on night shift, prioritizing and completing critical repairs that returned two aircraft to service before scheduled missions; restored xx hours of operational availability, protected mission timelines, and strengthened Air Force readiness.